nineveh_uk: Illustration that looks like Harriet Vane (Harriet)
nineveh_uk ([personal profile] nineveh_uk) wrote2014-10-20 10:10 pm

On disposing of pieces of paper

While it is true that it is possible to completely sort through, tidy, and remove junk from a house if you simply manage to remove more from it than you bring in, this only works if you do it more than 1 day out of 365.

Also if you actually read the books you've had for 10 years unread and that you have identified as "read the damn thing and move it on".

Also if you accept that you do not need to keep copies of random HPFGU theories for posterity. However amusing the Snape theories were.
antisoppist: (Default)

[personal profile] antisoppist 2014-10-21 09:57 am (UTC)(link)
I think you need to keep *everything* for posterity but I suffer from having enjoyed the glories of unearthing 1920s dance programmes, the Air Raid Warden helmet, my grandmother's love letters, and 1950s dresses as a child in the house in which nothing has ever been thrown away. And when my mother did throw something away it was the 1950s dresses that we used to do dressing up in and we are all now really cross about her having got rid of them. This is not helping.

But it is good that you are applying yourself to the task at hand. Slowly is better than "empty all boxes out over the floor in fit of zeal and enthusiasm, then hide, daunted, from the ensuing insurmountable chaos"
perennialanna: Plum Blossom (Default)

[personal profile] perennialanna 2014-10-21 01:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I do a three pile/box system for major clearing out - keep, chuck, and "I want to think about this for a bit longer". The thinking pile is usually smaller than I expect, because knowing that I don't have to make a final decision makes it easier to actually do so.