nineveh_uk: Illustration that looks like Harriet Vane (Default)
nineveh_uk ([personal profile] nineveh_uk) wrote2019-11-21 09:35 pm

I know it's been 20 years, and I love the book, but it feels a bit soon for another film of "Emma"

Though that sentiment is probably in large part because having seen the trailer, I am deeply unconvinced.

castiron: cartoony sketch of owl (Default)

[personal profile] castiron 2019-11-21 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm still waiting for a new Mansfield Park that's reasonably true to the original; the 1983 one is the only decent version I've seen.
lilliburlero: (ass)

[personal profile] lilliburlero 2019-11-21 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
God, that looks gruesome. There's that new David Copperfield adaptation too, that looks to be along similarly farcical lines, but Dickens at least gives more of an imprimatur for actual grotesques.
grondfic: (DeathHorse)

[personal profile] grondfic 2019-11-22 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
Actually I'll watch anything that has Johnny Flynn AND Bill Nighy in it.

*Is shallow. Runs and hides*

On Edit

Oh Wow! Rupert Graves AS WELL! I'm in!
Edited 2019-11-22 08:24 (UTC)
azdak: (Default)

[personal profile] azdak 2019-11-22 01:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Who on earth is Billy Nighy playing? He's too old for Mr Knightley and much too vigorous for Mr Woodhouse, and yet there he is, being wonderful, in a film that manifestly has no business casting him in the first place. And why is Emma played by someone who is deliberately trying to pout vacantly? It's a travesty, that's what it is. It is the Boris Johnson of Austen adaptations.