nineveh_uk (
nineveh_uk) wrote2008-02-21 09:09 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Oh for crying out loud!
“He had once owned the finest lyric soprano in Europe” does not refer to Peter Wimsey’s having been a particularly gifted boy treble. Not even as a pun.
Meanwhile, the WIP is still being recalcitrant. Fine, Troy, if you don’t want to be snogged senseless by Mr Scotland Yard 1938, back in the queue you go. I have therefore started proper work on the infamous Wimsey/Potterverse Mpreg, though don’t expect it any time soon. For one thing, it may take me a little while to recover from the horrors of the research.
Still a few of the prompt-based drabbles to go, but nearly there. This prompted me to think (via circuitous neural pathways) first how much Thrones, Dominations might be improved by zombies, and then how much Thrones, Dominations might be improved by almost anything.
For example, from p. 305:
‘All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well,’ said Peter, returning to her half-an-hour later. ‘You were quite right, Harriet; it is surprisingly easy to solve things by a little straight talking between intelligent adults if one can only throw off the shackles of tradition. Bunter has agreed not to get married and to stay, and I have agreed to the occasional threesome.’
Finally, George Galloway praised in traditional Bedouin verse (and remarkable Grauniad spelling):
George the intrepid, that symbol of pluck
Meanwhile, the WIP is still being recalcitrant. Fine, Troy, if you don’t want to be snogged senseless by Mr Scotland Yard 1938, back in the queue you go. I have therefore started proper work on the infamous Wimsey/Potterverse Mpreg, though don’t expect it any time soon. For one thing, it may take me a little while to recover from the horrors of the research.
Still a few of the prompt-based drabbles to go, but nearly there. This prompted me to think (via circuitous neural pathways) first how much Thrones, Dominations might be improved by zombies, and then how much Thrones, Dominations might be improved by almost anything.
For example, from p. 305:
‘All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well,’ said Peter, returning to her half-an-hour later. ‘You were quite right, Harriet; it is surprisingly easy to solve things by a little straight talking between intelligent adults if one can only throw off the shackles of tradition. Bunter has agreed not to get married and to stay, and I have agreed to the occasional threesome.’
Finally, George Galloway praised in traditional Bedouin verse (and remarkable Grauniad spelling):
George the intrepid, that symbol of pluck
no subject
no subject
Much improved.
no subject
Obviously I was being stupid, but I didn't think so at the time.
no subject
Agreed. Peter as choirboy would be a less gut-churningly awful use of "own".
no subject
no subject
Anyway, I bet the soprano saw their relationship in a rather different light, with Peter as her pet English gentleman.
no subject
no subject
*cheers*
Also, ought I to force myself through Thrones, Dominations just for hilarity purposes, or is it so bad that it can't even be so-bad-it's-good?
no subject
I reread it once in a while for the scenes with the French painter.
Presumption of Death is outright bad.
no subject
Urgh. That book is sitting on my shelf waiting for me to work up the courage to reading it. Just to be able to say how bad it is...
no subject
no subject
no subject
I do think that parts of T,D are well done - specifically the mystery plot. But I'd so much rather the Estate had chosen to release the manuscript than have a continuation done. Also, I disagree with a lot of the choices JPW made with the MS (of which I have read most, but not every page in detail). Why miss out Gerald sizing up Harriet at dinner (and confirmation that she is indeed a bit flat-chested), Harriet's grilling on Peter on why he didn't just apply himself to getting her into bed, a more interesting Lady Severn and Thames, and so on. And I just dont' think she really 'gets' Peter and Harriet. Presumption just magnifies these flaws, and reads rather too like a historical novel. Also, in both cases there is a problem with the murder, in that whilst I don't quite agree with whoever it was who said of Sayers that "the murder is anciliary to the purpose", all the books have much bigger themes than catching the murderer, and in neither continuation does this happen.
no subject
*perks up*
Harriet's grilling on Peter on why he didn't just apply himself to getting her into bed
*twitches*
a more interesting Lady Severn and Thames
DAMMIT. *starts working out logistics of making a side-trip to Wheaton*
no subject
no subject
Likewise. The official status wouldn't faze me, but I seem to recall finding Presumption!Harriet unforgivably insipid.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I don't know which I like more, your opening line or the idea of improving Thrones, Dominations with threesomes.
no subject
no subject
Wow! I was halfway through that article before realising that it probably wasn't a joke. I suspect The Unknown Poet has been done a major disservice by his translator - given that Holes is capable of translating the strictly constrained forms of Bedouin poetry into the much more accessible "if Ah'm the ruttin stallion - they're the hairs on mah testicles!" (George W. of the Arab leaders), why on earth did he opt for such dreadful doggerel in Galloway's case? "Pluck", forsooth! It sounds like a parody Kipling/Enid Blyton crossover from line one.
no subject
(The whole of the Bush poem is here (http://www.ox.ac.uk/media/news_releases_for_journalists/080212.html).
To sum things up, Ah rule the roost, with power presidential!
Ah say! Ah do! And with mah shoe, Ah kick ass – that’s essential!”)
no subject
Lots of poetry rhymes a lot, but that still doesn't mean you have to translate it as ghastly doggerel. Actually, the Galloway poem translation reminds me irresistibly of Shelley on Wordsworth:
Just for a handful of silver he left us,
Just for a riband to stick in his coat;
Found the one gift of which fortune bereft us,
Lost all the others she lets us devote.
Same beat and everything.
no subject
I must say the threesome comment made me snort water right up the beak. Mother would be horrified. (And then we'd have to explain to her what it was.)
Smashing in a hilarious sort of a way, though. Somehow I can't imagine Bunter unclothed. I do believe he formed from the very ether, completely kitted out, bowler and all.
And everyone knows bowlers in the bedroom are just no go.
no subject
Bunter unclothed is rather difficult. I can really only imagine fully-clothed hapless longing, or mostly clothed dark corners with accommodating parlourmaids. Although in my fantasy casting he is played by Colin Firth, and seen on screen that would probably help.