No. I am now imagining Bunter, Peter, or Parker arguing as to who has to do it as part of the investigation. Parker says that Peter would be more convincing because he’s an effete aristocrat. Peter says that this is true and that thereby he would not be in said bar as he knows people of his own class from school, and can pick up servants on country house weekends, whereas Parker is obviously a repressed self-loathing policeman on the hunt for a bit of rough. Parker suggests that he would therefore be mistrusted and proposes Bunter. Bunter points out that he is always free to resign and hands it back to Parker. Peter then decides that clearly he is the only one man enough to do it, at which point the others instantly start arguing their claims and it ends up with Bunter, who knows the chef at the Cat’s Pyjamas and can assure himself of a convenient table and the better champagne.
no subject
I think you should write this!