nineveh_uk: Illustration that looks like Harriet Vane (Harriet)
[personal profile] nineveh_uk
Well at least if everything is going to go to shit, I have a weekend with my family to commiserate in. But this is clearly going to take all night and I have to go to work tomorrow, so I'm off to bed. I was going to do a little rant, but I don't think I can be bothered to put it together (and I still need to pack). Let's see how things stand in the morning.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-07 11:46 pm (UTC)
sir_guinglain: (Default)
From: [personal profile] sir_guinglain
It will be an unpredictable parliament but a sign of a divided country and governments which have set out to divide for their own ends.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-08 05:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bookwormsarah.livejournal.com
It has gone to shit. I think there will be a lot of drinking this weekend.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-08 05:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bookwormsarah.livejournal.com
The bright side is that Lab gained both Cambridge and Norwich South, so both my parents are back in Labour hands.
Edited Date: 2015-05-08 05:52 am (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-08 06:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
That is a good bright side. My seat has seen a massive Lib Dem to Tory swing (Labour gone up by 2%). Looks like the Lib Dems have discovered that actually they are quite comfortable being Conservatives.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-08 06:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
I think that I might be drinking on the plane tonight. It's not like it could make me feel worse when I wake up tomorrow. Fuck the Lib Dems - they sold out (among so many things) on PR, and as a result we have a parliament that iss massively unrepresentative of the vote. And fuck Cameron, and the media moguls who bought him the election, and a goodly proportion of the population of this country.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-08 01:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grondfic.livejournal.com
*sigh* I can't disagree with your plans - or your masterly analysis.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-08 09:59 pm (UTC)
snorkackcatcher: (Registered Owl Post)
From: [personal profile] snorkackcatcher
I would like to second that.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-08 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Wouldn't PR have resulted in substantial UKIP seats. I understand people are upset, but UKIP as well would have surely been an awful result.
Lizzzar

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-08 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Quite possibly it would, although I believe many PR systems do have a "threshold" vote percentage a party must meet for representation. But the SNP polled 2 million votes and got 56 seats (+95% of Scottish constituencies), and UKIP polled 4 million votes and got 1. I loathe everything that UKIP stands for, but I don't feel that that is a proper outcome of a fair electoral system. UKIP should be countered by confronting their policies (and other parties will be entirely free not to make agreements with them in government), they aren't a justification to keep an unfair system.

(no subject)

Date: 2015-05-08 05:37 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Sorry, I do see that there is an argument that the vote would be represented more fairly. I think the end result would probably be more confused, with coalitions being necessary, and politics probably still pretty divided, but I agree that proportional representation could certainly be argued to at least let everyone's vote contribute to the eventual outcome.
Lizzzar

Profile

nineveh_uk: Illustration that looks like Harriet Vane (Default)
nineveh_uk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags