Rugby (Union) and fannish thoughts
Oct. 7th, 2007 08:59 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In the previously-mentioned universe in which Harriet Vane’s detective novels are made into a TV series (hopefully more faithfully than your average Christie adaptation), someone will have to be found to play her detective, Robert Templeton.
[Robert Templeton] was a gentleman of extraordinary scientific skill, combined with almost fabulous muscular development. He had arms like an orang-utan and an ugly but attractive face. She took conjured up his phantom before her in the suit of rather loud plus-fours with which she was accustomed to invest him, and took counsel with him in spirit.
I can now announce that that man is French rugby union player Sebastian Chabal. If this was Harriet’s vision of the archetypal great detective, no wonder it took her a while to reconcile herself to fancying Lord Peter Wimsey, who undoubtedly spent his first two terms at Eton having his head stamped into the mud every time he was forced, white knees trembling, out on to the field.
Still perfecting my Yuletide sign-up plans. Question, if twenty-one people have already volunteered to write Wimsey fanfic, why the hell aren’t they doing it the rest of the time?
[Robert Templeton] was a gentleman of extraordinary scientific skill, combined with almost fabulous muscular development. He had arms like an orang-utan and an ugly but attractive face. She took conjured up his phantom before her in the suit of rather loud plus-fours with which she was accustomed to invest him, and took counsel with him in spirit.
I can now announce that that man is French rugby union player Sebastian Chabal. If this was Harriet’s vision of the archetypal great detective, no wonder it took her a while to reconcile herself to fancying Lord Peter Wimsey, who undoubtedly spent his first two terms at Eton having his head stamped into the mud every time he was forced, white knees trembling, out on to the field.
Still perfecting my Yuletide sign-up plans. Question, if twenty-one people have already volunteered to write Wimsey fanfic, why the hell aren’t they doing it the rest of the time?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-07 08:32 pm (UTC)Never mind visitors popping by to suggest Juliet!Wimsey/Paris!Biggs. Be still my creaking brain.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 08:28 am (UTC)I know what you mean. My capacity for side-tracking myself when I am supposed to be just doing a bit of research is endless.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-07 08:41 pm (UTC)(And others need deadlines. And/or a place to post the resulting story.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 08:36 am (UTC)This is true. And for Yuletide as well (not that I ever intend to go near Wodehouse fic - I can't imagine where I'd start with the voice).
And one does sometimes forget that the rest of the world is not necessarily on LJ.
Incidentally, have you changed the photo of the image in your icon? Because it was ages before I could see that it was actually a picture, and now I always see it. Maybe it's like those fractal pictures.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 03:08 pm (UTC)I haven't changed the photo in my icon, though I probably should because the angle isn't very good and the colors are washed out. It's an actual stained glass/cement stepping stone I meade, currently residing in my front walk. But as with a lot of pattern recognition, once you know what it is it's impossible not to see.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-09 11:05 am (UTC)I am very impressed that you made the mosaic - I really like the colour/design.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-07 08:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 08:33 am (UTC)Details of requested and offered fandoms are here (http://www.yuletidetreasure.org/get_requested_fandoms.cgi). RPF What Not To Wear, anyone?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 09:17 am (UTC)I am slightly stunned by the number of people willing to write A. A Milne. I'm also unimaginably impressed that anyone is willing to write Wheel of Time or A Song Of Ice And Fire - imagine poking fruitlessly through a canon that size when you've forgotten exactly what colour someone's eyes are or whether they get along with their mother-in-law. Though there are probably HP Lexicon-like resources out there on the web.
Having had a look at the RPF lists, I asked
Thinking about it, I probably actually could turn my hand to 14th-century RPF, particularly if it involved Charles of Navarre, but I don't think I'm going to offer as it would just lead to boring heart-searchings about how far back I'm willing to go before my squick about RPF kicks in.
Have you noticed that there are four people offering The Slipper And The Rose?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 10:20 am (UTC)I've never really sat down and worked out my RPF feelings. I'm sure that some of my aversion comes not from fanfic, but from the incredible smugness of the TV/film scriptwriters who perpetrate modern RPF in the commercial media.
Have you noticed that there are four people offering The Slipper And The Rose?
I have! The only question is whether my request should be for “Why Can’t I Be Two People” angst fic in which Prince Edward actually suffers from schizophrenia. Answer, definitely not.
I am now kicking myself for not thinking of nominating Calamity Jane, but am delighted that someone is offering Ngaio Marsh. I wonder which characters they've all volunteered for? Must sign up and find out.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 11:15 am (UTC)Oh, those things that always have some dreadful impressionist playing the Prime Minister, whoever the Prime Minister happened to be at the time? Barf. I suspect the recent The Tudors comes into the same category considering that the scriptwriter was patting himself on the back in the Radio Times about conflating both Henry VIII's sisters into one princess, though I've recorded it anyway just so that I can see how bad it is.
I wish I'd had a look when I signed up to see exactly who they've got under 'RPF - Misc Actors'. The mind, it boggles.
There are probably people out there who'd be perfectly willing to write 'Why Can't I Be Two People' Edward / Edward, which would at least get round that faint grimace of distaste that Richard Chamberlain always seemed to produce when expected to do a het love scene, poor man.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 01:01 pm (UTC)That's it exactly. I think part of the issue is that such shows rarely seem to be about a good story that the writer/director really wants to tell, and much more about “ooh, how clever/daring/satirical we are”. The Queen works because it has a story (and perhaps because in a sense the Queen is already a fictional character), and Cambridge Spies and that ilk can work because they can be about Big Themes, but dramatised political gossip is not the same as art.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 01:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-09 02:36 am (UTC)*inordinately amused at the thought*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-07 09:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 08:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-07 09:08 pm (UTC)By the by, have you ever read Catriona McPherson's Dandy Gilver series? Its a series of mysteries set in 1920s Scotland, and starring an unromantic, married, detective who is in her late thirties. There are lots of lovely clothes, a handsome co-solver with whom she has a mild flirtation, and some thoroughly intriguing mysteries.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-07 09:22 pm (UTC)Are you me?
You should see the family trees for From The Ashes. I've got a database. ;)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 08:49 am (UTC)I haven't read Dandy Gilver, though I have seen their rather attractive jackets. I'd been cautious fearing another Maisie Dobbs (http://nineveh-uk.livejournal.com/17372.html), but it sounds worth a go (lovely 1920 clothes will hook me every time).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 08:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-07 09:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 08:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 07:28 am (UTC)You have indeed found the perfect Robert Templeton, though I suspect Harriet herself rather looks down on her readers for liking that sort of thing (plus fours??) - but perhaps he is a Guilty Pleasure.
And I'm not sure about Peter as anti-rugger - if anything, I imagine him as the original little tyke who picked up the football and fled with it. After all, by the time he got to Eton, he'd already had his father's training in being whipped over jumps (what's the exact phrase? Something about learning to pretend you're not afraid and taking out the change in nightmares).
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 09:22 am (UTC)I'm not sure about Harriet looking down on her readers for liking RT - the clothes are because she doesn't know about them (I wonder if he gets a makeover once she has Bunter and Peter to ask), but she does seem to try to do what she does sincerely.
Ah, so fragile Peter is in fact quite good at rugger, and thus gets beaten up off the field for showing up the big kids who look as if they ought to be better than he is? But his finding his salvation in being good at cricket does not suggest to me much liking for muddy contact sports.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 11:10 am (UTC)Isn't it Harriet who's thinking of RT as being fabulously muscley and looking like an orang-utan, though? That suggests she has a sense of the absurd as far as her creation goes. Or perhaps she only starts thinking of him in critical terms once she's met the real thing.
I took the being good at cricket as shorthand for general athletic skills, and assumed it was his salvation because being really brainy and keen on art didn't go down too well at public school in those days. Whereas being good at sports made you a god, and cricket was the king of sports. But of course it could well be that Peter had a general preference for not getting his head stamped in the mud, and hence was considered absurdly fastidious.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 12:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 12:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 12:57 pm (UTC)Popping home at lunchtime enabled me to check a bit of transcribed Thones, Dominations MS and the news that Denver's prime use to his little brother was preventing his being molested in the showers (I paraphrase a bit). I see Peter as holding up his own on the sports front at prep school, bolstered by being good at cricket and otherwise happy to run about kicking things as much as your average 9 year old, but coming a cropper faced with a gang of hefty Eton adolescents who actually take the whole thing seriously, and before you know it he's been knocked down a couple of times, made some unpopular remarks, and is Flimsy Wimsey.
My sister is a very slight rugby player, so it can be done, but she is also tall, unconcerned about filth, and was pulling doors off their hinges aged four.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 07:26 pm (UTC)Ho yuss, I definitely detect some paraphrasin' goin' on there.
Does Flim come from Flimsey? You learn something new every day. Makes perfect sense though. Okay, I'll buy it. As long as I am allowed to imagine that that Flimsey Wimsey took a Stalky-esque revenge on all molestery rugger buggers and face stampers.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-09 09:37 am (UTC)I like the idea of Stalky-esque revenge - a thirst for justice beginning with the rescue of some unhappy first year, pursual of the culprits, and a clever payback...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-09 09:42 am (UTC)Wow! Good old DL, telling it like it is. I'm impressed (or was that JPW?)
there may be scope for voluntary interest, esp. if one takes a Bill Clinton-ish view.
You mean "I didn't inhale, and she didn't swallow"?
I like the idea of Stalky-esque revenge
Preferably involving a dead cat.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-09 06:18 pm (UTC)You mean "I didn't inhale, and she didn't swallow"
I can only say "unk". But 17 year old Peter seems pretty much untouched by human hands as far as anything significant goes (17 1/2 yr old Peter, of course, being up for grabs).
Dead cat request noted.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 10:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-09 09:32 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-08 10:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-10-09 09:33 am (UTC)