Radio Gaga
Apr. 20th, 2009 10:39 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I spent an hour on Saturday sewing, and listening to the Afternoon Play on Radio 4.It was the sort of thing that Radio 4 does so well and so badly. It wasn’t about the Bevin boys, or mining, or cultural change in north-east England. It was a very thing tale of a young upper-middle class chap who briefly found himself in an unexpected situation, got used to it, and then went on with the rest of his life. The whole setting was merely detail to add verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative. Confirmation of this came towards the end in one of the modern sections in which the noble savage – sorry, miner’s – great-grandchild was called Kylie. Because whilst a bit of dignity might be afforded to workers in wartime, clearly their descendents are culture-less chavs. I must be fair, though – it had a pretty unpleasant attitude to our upper-middle class insurance broker, too, when you dug into it, and I won’t even start on its portrayal of women. So on the whole, I am glad I listened to it as a fascinating example of a particular brand of snobbery.
That said, for sheer “Was this written by someone on this planet”, nothing will ever beat “Working-class Harrogate girl goes to Trinity (Cantab) to read Classics, her tutor is a lesbian who tries to seduce her with Sappho, is rebuffed and then threatens that student isn’t really very good and will be lucky to scrape a Third, but heroine is saved by the nice Eton boy who helped carry her luggage on the first day.”
I am now 1/20 of the way through the Bible by page-count, not counting the Apocrypha (because they are in a separate volume, though I shall be reading them). Joseph and his coat turns out to have a few details that weren’t mentioned at school (though we were bang on about him being the sort of little brother anyone would want out of the way. The Chalet girls would have had something to say on the subject of tale-bearing for a start). First the not-evil nature of Reuben, second the brain-dead nature of Jacob and family (Joseph: Say that you are cattle herders. The Egyptians hate shepherds. Pharaoh: What do you lot do, then? Jacob and co: We’re shepherds.), and third that Joseph took advantage of a famine to pinch one-fifth of the nation’s land for Pharaoh (so presumably the people can now produce less food), then when everyone is starving, gives them corn first for money, then for their cattle, then for enslaving themselves. Whilst giving lots of land to his family. This is not the only instance at which I am murmuring to myself that I can really see why certain groups of right-wingers love Genesis. Meanwhile the Lord at the beginning of Exodus is behaving a lot like Terry Pratchett’s Om, and the KJV is continuing to have the slash problem of lots of unidentified hims and hes.
And now to be really controversial, Susan Boyle is a more than passable singer, but by no means a great one.
That said, for sheer “Was this written by someone on this planet”, nothing will ever beat “Working-class Harrogate girl goes to Trinity (Cantab) to read Classics, her tutor is a lesbian who tries to seduce her with Sappho, is rebuffed and then threatens that student isn’t really very good and will be lucky to scrape a Third, but heroine is saved by the nice Eton boy who helped carry her luggage on the first day.”
I am now 1/20 of the way through the Bible by page-count, not counting the Apocrypha (because they are in a separate volume, though I shall be reading them). Joseph and his coat turns out to have a few details that weren’t mentioned at school (though we were bang on about him being the sort of little brother anyone would want out of the way. The Chalet girls would have had something to say on the subject of tale-bearing for a start). First the not-evil nature of Reuben, second the brain-dead nature of Jacob and family (Joseph: Say that you are cattle herders. The Egyptians hate shepherds. Pharaoh: What do you lot do, then? Jacob and co: We’re shepherds.), and third that Joseph took advantage of a famine to pinch one-fifth of the nation’s land for Pharaoh (so presumably the people can now produce less food), then when everyone is starving, gives them corn first for money, then for their cattle, then for enslaving themselves. Whilst giving lots of land to his family. This is not the only instance at which I am murmuring to myself that I can really see why certain groups of right-wingers love Genesis. Meanwhile the Lord at the beginning of Exodus is behaving a lot like Terry Pratchett’s Om, and the KJV is continuing to have the slash problem of lots of unidentified hims and hes.
And now to be really controversial, Susan Boyle is a more than passable singer, but by no means a great one.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 10:27 am (UTC)Joseph was a bit of a beast, really. Of course, one of the fascinating things about the OT is the wide variety of attitudes to politics you get within it - most notably the attitude to kings, because you've got all the Davidic cheer-leading, combined with strands that are very much against the institution of the monarchy. And then there's all the stuff about slavery and years of jubilee, and God's judgement on those who exploit the poor and powerless, which tends to be read more enthusiastically on the left than on the right....
Yesterday a Jehovah's Witness gave me a tract which, as well as informing me that 'Christendom' had betrayed God*, enthused about how we knew the Bible was true because of it's beautiful coherence and total lack of self-contradiction. I couldn't help wondering if they hadn't got confused and been reading the Koran (which is not, admittedly, totally internally coherent, but is a lot nearer being such than the Bible, for what ought to be fairly obvious reasons).
* Arguably true, but not, I think, because of EVOL TRINITARIANISM.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:34 am (UTC)Verse x. The Lord said: No-one shall live to be more than 120.
Verse y. And K was 877 when he died.
Does not seem to me totalling lacking in self-contradiction.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:56 am (UTC)Though I think I found Judith disappointing compared to the Old English version
Everything is better in Old English!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 02:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 01:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:35 am (UTC)ETA: Which is a real whinge. To mitigate the circumstances, he is someone held up as a role model in the Old Testament, and the childhood version, which emphasises hard work and, to an extent, the taming of authority and the forgiveness of your enemies, appealed to a serious small boy wary of the forces of chaos.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 12:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 01:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 01:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 04:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 01:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 10:40 am (UTC)I don't understand all the fuss over SB. Didn't EXACTLY the same thing happen last year with Paul Potts? Unattractive loser type comes on, expresses ambitions that make everyone snigger, and then opens his mouth and wows everyone? And that went down so well that they naturally decided to do it again, as soon as they could find an unattractive loser type with an unexpectedly good voice.
I've got nothing against SB winning, I just hate being so obviously manipulated (shots of judges looking dismissive, shots of audience sniggering, followed by SB singing and judges looking weepy and astonished, so we understand that she is a Really Good Singer and Talent Has Triumphed).
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:36 am (UTC)This does indeed appear to be Paul Potts again, except that with her being female they can really play up the appearance element. I hate these sorts of reality shows (actually, most reality shows). I can't cope with the comedy of embarrassment, and like Trinny and Susannah they aren't really about finding the best person at all, but filling a very well-defined niche.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:04 am (UTC)"The least plain girl is always the family beauty"--George Bernard Shaw's mum.
PS--Chavre: tartan goat cheese?
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 01:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:47 am (UTC)15 An when i sed DO NOT WANT!!1!!!1! he got skeerd An ran awai An left his cloths here. Naked jospeh is..naked.
16 An she kept his cloths til potiphar cam bak 2 his base.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 01:04 pm (UTC)I kinda feel I'm grateful to be old enough (*granny-talk*) to have received both!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:54 am (UTC)I did enjoy Susan Boyle singing, and she does have a lovely voice, even if there was a part of me saying 'it sounds beautiful, but where's Fantine?'. But you're right about the manufactured nature of it all; as a friend of mine pointed out, surely, as a human being, she deserved the right not to be ridiculed in public, even if she ended up completely muffing the song.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 02:06 pm (UTC)surely, as a human being, she deserved the right not to be ridiculed in public, even if she ended up completely muffing the song
Alas, I fear that such an approach would go completely against the raison d'etre of the show...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 12:12 pm (UTC)Oh goodness, I remember hearing that one!
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 12:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 12:48 pm (UTC)Sorry, suffering a certain amount of wishing I'd been less polite when listening to two rather upper-middle-class teachers talking about their hearts sinking when their class register includes particular names - including names I went to school with (so to speak) and the names of children of friends of mine.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 01:31 pm (UTC)Sorry - should have made that this is conscious the use of the name in the play. She's the only child (at a school event) mentioned by name, and it's clearly, in its unmistakeable modernity, chosen as a sign for the audience to compare the past, with its solid community, manly work, very-long-way-north distinctiveness, with a superficial present, where the pit head stands by a golf course and is-the-parade-any-more-than-a-tourist-attraction. The use of the child only works if the name is intended to evoke a negative reaction in the audience, and to act as a crude shorthand for "that world is gone". It is a deliberate cheap shot on the part of the playwright that relies on a consensus on the part of his audience.
two rather upper-middle-class teachers
Which is one of the reasons why, tho' I have some issues with SATs, I don't think that classroom-based, teacher-assessment is in fact a panacea.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 02:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 01:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 01:52 pm (UTC)I didn't get to do any such excitements because the previous primary school headmaster didn't hold with such things (or with us learning to swim) and he didn't retire until the year I left.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 02:46 pm (UTC)Agreed.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 05:04 pm (UTC)I always thought that Joseph deserved everything he got...
(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-21 01:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 08:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-04-20 11:48 pm (UTC)Hardly a controversial opinion. I'm still convinced she was lip-synching. That was my first thought as soon as the audio came on.
And is she wasn't? She can carry a tune, but I can't count the number of student and church choir singers I've heard in my life that I'd rate much, much higher.
As always with "reality" TV, this is about the "story". And I'm convinced this one is another one of Simon's plants. Another "feel good" story he'll be making millions off of while she has the public's sympathies on her side, then drop her like a rock, just like he did Paul Potts, another mediocre talent sold as a "brilliant find" by the Cowell spin machine.