nineveh_uk: Cover illustration for "Strong Poison" in pulp fiction style with vampish Harriet. (Strong Poison)
[personal profile] nineveh_uk
When Lord Peter Wimsey has his revolver on him in the course of criminological investigation, where does he carry it?

Wimsey apparently has a range of firearms to hand in canon. Leaving aside the unnamed weapon, presumably a shotgun, with which he despatches a partridge in Whose Bodu, he possesses an "automatic pistol" in The Learned Adventure of the Dragon's Head (AKA the one with little St George), and has "a revolver ready" in Five Red Herrings, in circumstances in which the person he may potentially use it on is not apparently aware of the fact*.

In my particular circumstances I am working on the assumption that Wimsey has a bog-standard WWI British army service revolver, which Wikipedia tells me was a Webley Mk IV,V, or VI depending when issued. So I know what it looks like. But how does he carry it on his person, when he's not actually holding it in his hand? Bear in mind it is hot, and he is wearing a linen suit comprised of trousers, waistcoat, and possibly jacket, and he doesn't want anyone approaching him to notice that he's carrying it. Does he have a belt, some sort of holster, or even just shove it in his pocket? Wimsey's pockets do appear at times to have a similar carrying capacity to Mary Poppins' bag.

*And also, that the police don't mind him potentially intending to shoot - or at least threaten - a suspect. As he presumably didn't go on holiday with it, I can only assume it was sent up from London specifically with the idea of confrontation in mind. I must look up whether there is a DLS Society article on contemporary gun laws in the UK, but as my scene is set not only in Corsica, but wizarding Corsica, I am happily able to avoid concern with accuracy on that front.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-16 08:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com
presumably a shotgun

Undoubtedly. Almost equally undoubtedly, a 12-bore, and English-made; presumably from Purdey or Holland & Holland.

But how does he carry it on his person, when he's not actually holding it in his hand?

A large jacket pocket - or a large trouser pocket - could take one. However, drawing it would not be entirely straightforward - any projections (foresight, hammer, the loop on the butt that the lanyard goes through) could catch, unless they had been filed down or removed altogether. And it could go in a belt, but again it could catch, and would be awkward. My money is on a holster.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 08:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
I thought/hoped you might have some information on this point. Thank you! I think I shall go for a holster when that is possible discretely, and otherwise a pocket (I assume that contemporary safety devices are sufficient that if carrying a weapon in a pocket the risk of its going off are limited!).

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com
Limited, although not non-existent. The biggest risk is probably that of the user sticking his hand in the pocket and absent-mindedly fiddling with the trigger.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Perhaps not a great idea for Peter, as a confirming fidgeter.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-16 09:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com
Oh, well, if it's wizarding Corsica, it could be an invisible revolver. Or, for that matter, a Wandley Mk IV, V, or VI.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 08:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Unfortunately for Wimsey - and partly why he is walking round with a gun - he is not a wizard in the case. Though I like the idea of special issue Ministry wands for duelling...

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-16 11:59 pm (UTC)
aunty_marion: (iSnape hand)
From: [personal profile] aunty_marion
Wizarding Corsica? Well, a wizard-space pocket springs to mind...

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 08:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Hmm. I wonder if that would work for a Muggle (which Wimsey remains) - it is never very clear how much magical devices are complete in themselves, or require magic to operate.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com
"Mummy! Mummy!" Gerald shouted, his face rubicund. "I don't WANT to go to Hogwarts! I want to go to Eton!"

"We must always do our duty, my dear," the Duchess told him. She sighed. If only Peter weren't a squib...at least the lad had a lively mind.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 01:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] executrix.livejournal.com
PS--on a more serious note, Peter would presumably have a trench coat, with very deep pockets.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
He does at various points in canon, but in this particular scene it is about 25C and he's hiking, so not idea wear.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 12:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adina-atl.livejournal.com
Surely you knew that ALL firearms appear when needed and disappear when not. It's like the swords in Highlander.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 08:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Good point! They also never need re-loading except at points when it is crucial to the plot.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 12:37 am (UTC)
ext_422737: uncle hallway (Hallway)
From: [identity profile] elmey.livejournal.com
All I know about holsters I learned on TV... but there seem to be holsters you can clip on your belt/waistband. In MFU, they wear them on the back of their skirts. (http://www.framecaplib.com/mfulib/html/episodes/images/napoleon/napol024.htm) God only knows how useless useful that is. I'm sure there are more practical models though :)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
For a moment there I was a bit puzzled at the thought of Napoleon Solo attaching a holster to the back of his skirt...

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 02:43 pm (UTC)
ext_422737: uncle hallway (Hallway)
From: [identity profile] elmey.livejournal.com
Napoleon is very versatile...

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 03:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eglantine-br.livejournal.com
Resisting the urge to shout: 'Up his sleevies!' (That is for Napoleon.)

What about those mysterious inside jacket pockets?

Or perhaps Bunter has figured a way to modify clothing so PW can get at his weapon without spoiling the line of his clothing?

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:34 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
perhaps Bunter has figured a way to modify clothing so PW can get at his weapon without spoiling the line of his clothing?

Good point! As it seems it is possible to keep a gun in an ordinary pocket, then given that all Wimsey's clothes are hand-made, it might not be difficult to make sure that in the process they were suitable for carrying a weapon.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 11:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com
Yes, that can be done. Essentially, you need a very strong bag around the pocket, securely attached to the waistband of the trousers or the body of the jacket. More one for Peter's tailor, though, I think.

You would still want to file down the foresight etc, to avoid them catching on the cloth.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eglantine-br.livejournal.com
Of course, you are right about the tailor. (The one who 'invented Peter's back.') But I have no doubt Bunter could do it himself in a pinch, and could give the tailor minute instructions too!

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Peter's tailor is definitely a versatile man, so it shouldn't be beyond him.

Foresight being the pointy bit on the end of the barrel?

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 10:01 pm (UTC)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-12-12 01:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wellinghall.livejournal.com
Belatedly -

Rifles have a foresight (the pointy bit at the front) and a rear sight (rather than a hindsight) (a notch at the back). Pistols and shotguns only have the foresight, but it is generally called that, rather than just the sight.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 04:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sonetka.livejournal.com
Any chance he could be wearing Oxford bags? I've seen photos which make it look like you could conceal an entire shotgun rack in one of those things. However, Wiki informs me that they weren't introduced until 1924, which is a bit late for him to be taking up undergraduate fashions. Unless, of course, it's part of a disguise which doubtless gives great pain to both Peter and Bunter.

More realistically, I'd vote for the holster.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Those photos of proper Oxford bags are hilarious. Although not as hilarious as the description on this presumably US webpage: Around 1924, at Oxford University, a small group of male students began wearing loosely fitted and extremely wide legs trousers in reaction to a ban on knickers in University classrooms. At their knees and cuffs they measured between twenty-two and forty inches wide, slipped over their knickers.

Banning students wearing knickers in the classroom sounds an entirely reasonable thing to me (though the author means, I assume plus fours, as opposed to women/girls' underwear).

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eglantine-br.livejournal.com
Giggle!

Picturing them defiantly shivering in panties. Mid-winter in my imagination and with a brisk wind.

Students that age are nearly still teenagers and nobody can tell teenagers what to wear. ("I'm not cold!!)

My daughter says she does not need a winter coat this year, just a sweater. (Coat will be purchased anyway, obviously.)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Everyone knows that coats are for weaklings!

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 08:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com
Were shoulder holsters at all common back then, though? Military holsters go over the uniform rather than under it, the police weren't armed, and private citizens had no business to be walking around carrying concealed small arms so there can't have been much of a market for them. My gut feeling is that he wouldn't have had a shoulder holster but kept it in his capacious pockets, or possibly tucked into his belt.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 10:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
I think I'm going for a combination of holster (an ex-army one is a thought), when he want to be obvious or his clothes allow it (no problem under a light coat) and otherwise a pocket, possibly specially adapted. The problem with belts is the extra complicated question as to whether Wimsey actually wears a belt or braces with a particular pair of trousers*. No wonder Harriet gave up and made Robert Templeton a messy dresser in order to avoid the whole issue.

*Not that anyone around him at the moment is qualified to criticise.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 02:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] helenajust.livejournal.com
My immediate reaction would be: in a pocket. If he was wearing a trench-coat, in the pocket of that. Otherwise, his jacket pocket. I don't think it would fit easily in the pocket of his trousers, and I think it would show. You're right that he would need to be careful about the sights catching, etc.. Since he carried a weapon so rarely I doubt if he would have his clothes modified for that purpose. I suppose he might have one or two jackets with strengthened pockets which he would wear on those occasions when he knew he wanted to carry a weapon.

I feel it would be unlikely that he would use a holster. Gentlemen just didn't own them then! And I think gentlemen tended to wear braces to hold up their trousers and not belts.

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 04:07 pm (UTC)
aunty_marion: Loki made me do it (Loki made me do it)
From: [personal profile] aunty_marion
I don't think it would fit easily in the pocket of his trousers, and I think it would show.

"Is that a gun in your pocket, Peter, or are you just pleased to see me?" (said Harriet, never!)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 04:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] helenajust.livejournal.com
I restrained myself from saying that! but I'm glad you didn't...

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Entertaining as that scenario would be, I fear it is unlikely :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2013-11-17 09:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Given that Peter's so rich, I can imagine him having a couple of suits with large enough/modified pockets, so he doesn't have to spoil the line of his everyday wear!

Gentlemen still don't wear holsters! I agree on the braces - again, presumably the fact that suits are hand-tailored means they fit perfectly so you don't need a belt.

Profile

nineveh_uk: Illustration that looks like Harriet Vane (Default)
nineveh_uk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags