nineveh_uk: Illustration that looks like Harriet Vane (Default)
[personal profile] nineveh_uk
In the interests of preserving the artistic integrity of I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue, I feel that Rob Brydon should be forced to perform all his songs in a diving mask.

Having whinged at length yesterday about corporate-speak in job adverts, it occurred to me that these days, Death Bredon would never have got a job at Pym's Publicity. At least, not without going through a lengthy recruitment process.

*

“Thank you, Mr Bredon,” observed Mr Pym. “Your CV is certainly most impressive. However we at Pym’s Publicity never appoint anybody to a position without first requiring them to undertake a full portfolio of psychometric testing, personal calibration exercises, and Find Your Niche! questionnaires in order to ascertain just which particular position in our organisation is not only right for us, but right for you!

“Sounds fascinatin’,” said Bredon. “But if you would indulge my curiosity – dreadful habit, curiosity; incurable, too – when did you introduce this most interestin’ regime?”

“Oh, about two years ago.”

“Did you perhaps accompany it with the institution of performance-related pay, peer appraisal, and compulsory away days at Margate?”

“Why, Mr Bredon! I see that I am speaking to a fellow believer! You are quite right. I am particularly proud of our “Parachute Club” outings promoting self-development and team-building.”

“I don’t suppose,” said Bredon with some diffidence, “that it was the late lamented Mr Dean who introduced these jolly schemes?”

“It was indeed,” said Pym. “You can imagine how hard his loss has hit out Human Capital department. Why, the copywriters have still not had their peer appraisal!”

“Hmm. Well, I’m terribly sorry, Pym old boy, but I really don’t think that I can take the case. I’ve had a good chinwag with the copywriters, and a look at the fearfully knobbly iron staircase, and I’m afraid that there’s no doubt about it – poor old Dean was the author of his own end. A piece of advice, if I may – fearfully impertinent of me, I’m sure – but I hear that the latest edition of Our Forwarding Together! raises doubts about peer appraisal – rather stressful for the HC chaps, donchaknow, and failing to deal with immediate problems in the way that a daily Unstructured Team Mutual Orientation meeting does. They recommend eleven as the best time – creative juices flowing and all that. I’m sure you’ll see it work wonders for morale. Well, toodle-pip!”

*

The ever-reliable Ladies Against Feminism continues to provide its sure-fire cure for low blood pressure. This week I am amused/horrified by But I Am Submissive!

Be on the lookout this week for manipulative reactions to your husband’s requests. If he asks you to do something (that is not sinful) and you get the urge to show your disapproval with a healthy dose of the “silent treatment,” repent right away and out loud. Confess to your husband right then and there that you were tempted to control him by ignoring him and ask him to hold you accountable.

Oh yes, tell him you've been a bad girl and want punishing! Kiss that rod! Hold me accountable, baby!

Still not as mind-boggling as the LAF review of the BBC's North and South, though.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-19 09:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bookwormsarah.livejournal.com
Ladies Against Feminism? Oh, where to start...

(firstly by pointing out to them that if they want to state that people should read their first page in its entirity, they should try and make it a little shorter...). The Bible references do say much about the slant.

The North and South review did make me wonder if they had been watching a different programme. Just shows how different people can hold wildly different interpretations of the same story.
Unlike most worldly films, this one does not hit the viewer with any obvious carnal exhibition, but leaves the viewer feeling respected and dignified. What a gem. I shall

Where did you find the site? Have you explored Conservapedia? I use this if I'm feeling particularly apathetic. The entry on homosexuality makes particularly fume worthy reading.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-20 09:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
I think I found the link via [livejournal.com profile] daegaer. It is certainly another world! Conservapaedia sounds...interesting. I am impressed with the way they attempt to imply that there wasn't actually a proper second world war until America arrived, with all that invading Poland stuff just Europe being weak.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-20 09:50 am (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
Conservapaedia always used to have the worst (most inaccurate, and also most incoherent) page on 'Life on Mars' anywhere on the Internet. It also had some strange things to say about Doctor Who.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-20 11:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Also, it is Conservapedia - no pinko British spelling on this site (apparently Wikipedia's use of US or British spelling is anti-American).

It says of Friends:

"The show deceptively promoted liberal activities such as sex outside of marriage, pornography, and homosexuality, without disclosing the adverse effects such behavior, including increased disease, infertility, depression and domestic violence. The show had little long-term influence in television or culture."

(no subject)

Date: 2007-11-20 12:09 pm (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Aargh! No!)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
Bizarrely, though, they appear to be "Life of Brian" fans...

Profile

nineveh_uk: Illustration that looks like Harriet Vane (Default)
nineveh_uk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags