nineveh_uk: Illustration that looks like Harriet Vane (Default)
[personal profile] nineveh_uk
Line of the week, from Growing Up by Angela Thirkell, 1943:

“I do adore cocks,” said Lydia, “but I’m married now.”

Another Sayers-didn’t-writes, lines from the original text obviously not my own, mild spoiler warnings apply, although not who/what/howdunnit. This is not a project I ought to have started just before moving, with work becoming horribly hectic, especially when I had ideas, even text, for the ones at the end, but not for the ones in the middle.

Unnatural Death

‘All the same,’ urged the nondescript young man, dubiously extracting a bubbling-hot Helix Pomatia from its shell, and eyeing it nervously before putting it in his mouth, ‘if he thought the young woman was being murdered, surely it’s a clear case of public duty to voice one’s suspicions?’

‘Of your duty, Charles – yes’ said the young man with the monocle. ‘By the way, it’s not a public duty to eat snails if you don’t like ‘em.’

‘It’s not the taste –’ Charles began, before putting his hand to his mouth with an unpleasant coughing sound and knocking over his chair in his hasty retreat to the lavatory door, concealed behind a Chinese-painted screen. The young man with the monocle fixed the snails with an inquisitorial eye, murmured to the waiter, who also followed the screened route, and leapt into the kitchen.

Hearing the row erupting behind the swing doors, an early crash and splash followed by the sound of swearing in a continental tongue, the thin-faced young doctor at the next table, who had been eavesdropping with quiet interest, mentally totted up his bill, shoved some coins on the table and slipped out of the door.

‘Don’t want to get caught in a dubious case,’ he muttered to himself. ‘After the Dawson affair, another one’d be the end of me.’

*

‘I’ve been wondering,’ said Charles, lying quietly in the hospital bed in which he had been induced to remain by the prospect of a visit on the morrow from Lady Mary Wimsey, ‘how you knew so quickly that it was the chef who had poisoned the snails, and not the waiter. He had the better opportunity, after all.’

‘Undoubtedly, but it’s not so hard for a chef in a crowded kitchen to find a moment to slip a few drops of the Noxious Substance into the chosen molluscs, and besides, the waiter had no motive for poisoning me, whereas it seems that M. Dubois far from letting bygones be bygones and learnin’ from experience, has not forgiven me for those six months in stir over the Red Lion, but been nourishin’ most unsavoury feelin’s of vengeance in an unexpectedly fiery bosom.’

‘You knew that Dubois was in the kitchen, then?’

‘Of course – no other man could have induced me to venture on the tripe. But even so, it had to be the chef, because even were the waiter not an elderly Cockney of - these days - irreproachable virtue, he took the order and had he meant to do the deed best done quickly, would have popped the poison in the proper platter, and not on the unhappy Helix. Whereas the chef, having only the orders to work from, naturally assumed that the officer of the law was the chap on the plain diet, and the decadent aristocrat intending to chomp on the beast that crawls on the ground.’

You are still assuming,’ said Charles in somewhat peevish tones, ‘that the poison was intended for you. I suppose a mere policeman who will never touch snails again shouldn’t presume to more than a cosh in a dark alley?’

‘Nonsense, Charles acushla. I have no doubt that the length and breadth of the dark jungle of criminal London is stuffed to the gills with ingenious types just itching to put you away by foul and unnatural means. But in a restaurant staffed entirely by ex-criminals, some not insubstantial number of whom yours truly has been shall we say instrumental in roughly wooing from their former way of life, I regret to say that I am the obvious target. Oh, didn’t I tell you? It’s my other defence against the lampposts of the revolution.’

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 11:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grondfic.livejournal.com
*applauds wildly*

VERY clever indeed.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 03:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Thank you! *bows*

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 12:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] azdak.livejournal.com
I'm so glad this is a series - it gives me something to look forward to. But how unspeakable of Peter to lure Charles into a restaurant staffed by ex-criminals without telling him! I notice that Peter let Charles sample the snails first...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 03:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
It wasn't supposed to be quite so much of a series, I just didn't get my act together! (Although I do like a couple of the later ones).

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 12:12 pm (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
Oh, poor Charles! That's really not nice of Peter. Very in character for whats his name the doctor, who was a thorough bad lot, in a quiet way.

Also love the idea of Peter one-upping Jamie Oliver...

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 03:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Peter protests that he took Charles entirely in good faith, and thought that all the criminals were reformed. Also, he would never do adverts for Sainsburys!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 10:25 pm (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
Well, I did say 'one upping'. Not doing supremely annoying adverts for supermarket chains falls under that heading... ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-05 04:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Good point. Though it's not as if Peter needs the money.

(Though he might write the copy, if pressed).

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 03:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adina-atl.livejournal.com
The doctor was definitely a bad lot, in a supremely arrogant way. Slipping out quietly is certainly in character--his own convenience and safety, regardless of whether Parker had needed medical attention.

Well done snippet! Like everyone else, I look forward to the rest of the books treated in similar fashion.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
his own convenience and safety, regardless of whether Parker had needed medical attention.

I'm glad that came across. The doctor's definitely not a good representative of his profession. Having just re-read the book, one wonders whether in fact he was more interested in providing Agatha Dawson murdered for the fame/money it would bring to his practice, than to bring her killer to justice.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adina-atl.livejournal.com
He had no interest in bringing her killer to justice, that was clear, never had. At the time of her death, he was only looking for something to salve his professional pride by proving that there was something else besides his miscalculation to account for her dying before he predicted. At the time of his first meeting with Peter and Charles, he just wanted someone to vent his grievances to.

The doctor's attitude in the snippet was very clear, without beating the reader over the head with it. Nice balance between subtlety and obscurity--a balance that I have the worst time with in my own writing.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 10:28 pm (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
Yes, he's a swine (in canon, his behaviour to his fiancee demonstrates that, quite apart from his alarm at Wimsey raking things up. Of course, in the long run the girl was much better off without him, but still...)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-05 11:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
It's a pity really that he doesn't run up against Wimsey as a villain later on, he'd deserve it.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-05 12:39 pm (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
Hm.... An interesting idea, that!

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 01:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bronze-ribbons.livejournal.com
Ah, poor Charles, always taking the brunt...

in a restaurant staffed entirely by ex-criminals

AhA. A cousin to the Cattery?

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
A cousin to the Cattery?

Could be... There's actually a Ngaio Marsh story based on the idea, with a post-war bloke keeps his Dartmoor-ish country house going by staffing it with local ex-murderers.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 04:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] adina-atl.livejournal.com
There's a Josephine Tey book where the detective sets up a former criminal up in a restaurant, too.

But I don't think you become an ex-murderer, just a reformed one. The moving pen writes, and all that.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-05 11:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
But I don't think you become an ex-murderer, just a reformed one.

Good point (unless you're the hangman?).

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-11 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zanesfriend.livejournal.com
Murder is "the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought." If one is a hangman, then one's professional killings are not murder.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-13 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Depends on whether one thinks that that the death penalty can be legal ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-13 07:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zanesfriend.livejournal.com
As a matter of positive law, it has been legal in the past, and is still in some places.

Such laws may be wrong or unjust, but if they were passed by properly constituted legal authority according to the jurisdictions' legislative procedure, they are nevertheless valid laws, and acting in accordance with them (assuming that one is a citizen or resident of the juristiction) is not a crime. It may still be an immoral or unethical act, but it is not a crime.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-blue-fenix.livejournal.com
Please keep on writing wimseyfic. So few people do it at all, let alone this well.

TBF, humming "don't go changin'"

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-05 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Thank you! Judging by the large box of WIPs, I won't be stopping anytime soon.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 09:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ex-lizzzar998.livejournal.com
I don't think anyone could write wimseyfic better.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-05 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
*is flattered* Though except for DLS, obviously ;-)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-04 10:54 pm (UTC)
marginaliana: Buddy the dog carries Bobo the toy (Default)
From: [personal profile] marginaliana
Ha! Delightful. Oh, poor Charles.

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-05 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
But he ends up with Mary soothing his fevered brow, so it's not all bad.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-06-12 03:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
Still 6 to go!

Profile

nineveh_uk: Illustration that looks like Harriet Vane (Default)
nineveh_uk

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags